Forum:Admin hiatus limits

Hello, I think that to best improve the efficiency of administrators and remove any element of uncertainty, I believe that we should remove the powers of users who have been gone (i.e. not edited) for 6 months; if they are a bureaucrat, a year. The procedure would be as follows: once the full term of the allowable limit has been reached, a notice will be placed on that users' wall (or hopefully talk page, if and when they are restored); if the user does not respond within a month, then a vote will be held and their rights removed if the consensus for that decision is reached. This also applies to rollback. If the user later returns, they can request their rights back and a second vote can be held to give them back. This poll will be held in conformity with our site voting policy.-- 00:42, March 17, 2014 (UTC)

Vote
Support
 * 1)  20:03, March 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Ryoga 04:22, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  06:52, March 18, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * I think this is a good idea. What's the point of someone being an administrator or bureaucrat if they're never here? I think this is the fairest method to deal with such an occasion. 20:03, March 17, 2014 (UTC)
 * I also support this proposal. However, I must note that I'm not so sure about revoking rollback rights. Ryoga (talk) 04:22, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
 * Why not? There's no point in having rollback powers if one isn't an active member of the community. Also, one can always request to have them returned. 04:28, March 18, 2014 (UTC)