Thread:TsukiYaksha/@comment-28016152-20160520015537/@comment-4576906-20160522050352

The point is that it was a valid edit and you should have provided an edit summary to let other contributors know why you were reverting an otherwise permissible edit, which you did not. Instead of reverting on subsequent instances (whether trying to compromise or not) you should have immediately started a discussion on the talk page, before not after. But you did continue to revert, and that is why I protected the page, to prevent the edit dispute from getting more out of hand. You only started a discussion after the fact, and it never should have gotten to the point where I had to protect the page in the first place.

When people choose to complain about being mistreated, when in fact they are not being courteous to others (in this case Joe-jostar-mega) or following common sense practices, I consider that disruptive because you chose to deflect from the real issue by painting yourself as a victim instead of recognizing that you made a mistake, accepting it, learning from it, and moving on.

But I'm glad you've reflected on this, and I hope you will return and follow a more collaborative spirit of editing. You simply have to not take every little thing personally and accept that not all of your contributions will be accepted right away and that some require additional discussion.