Thread:Lord Hyōga/@comment-28016152-20160321001623/@comment-4576906-20160321135551

I have told both of you what the policy is; what Inuyashaluver is arguing over is not what is or is not canon, but the content and style of individual articles. That is something to be discussed, not forced on others. I will not bow down to mean-spirited bullying.

Both of you are now taking things out of context and twisting them in ways that are now simply preposterous. I refuse to be intimidated, and I will not "remove the warnings" because policy is policy. Maybe you think you are above the rules, but you are not. You don't get to negotiate around policy. If you act in an unconstructive manner, you will be sanctioned. Since it was Inuyashaluvers first time violating policy, I left him/her with a warning instead of a full-block (which is also recommended by policy). You don't get to request the warnings to be removed, or get special treatment, as this would violate the equality policy.

Now, both of you have written far too much for me to respond to every little thing, since most of it is just an attempt to justify your irresponsible behavior. However, I have already addressed the substance of your arguments and made my ruling (i.e. yes, the information is canon; yes, it should be on the wiki; yes, it is on the wiki already; but no, not on every single page, only where relevant). Therefore, as all of the substantive issues have been addressed and resolved, I consider this topic concluded.