Thread:TsukiYaksha/@comment-28016152-20160520015537

TsukiYaksha,

During the past few days, I have been waiting for you to reply to me and mostly dealing with my father’s death. When I wrote to you I was not aware the page was locked, or I would had said something. However, my last edit was my last edit to that subject. I did make a discussion on the Inuyokai page please see picture. That is the second time, it must had overwritten the first time. After the second time, I thought they were deleted or not accepted and went to you. I know it did not post now. Since it seems I am having internet issues. http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:18993 and community.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:1038875

I came to you since it would been more beneficial, because you have morals, you are honest and have ethics, and by all means approachable. I promise myself to come to you when problems arises regardless who was directly involved and so no, not running to a third party. Because I came to realize no matter how hard you try, you can’t fix something that no longer works. As seen here. with the last four comments. Going to another admin is still correct procedure encourage by wikia. Also, anyone can revert bad edits. Admins still have to abide by Wikia TOU and guidelines. no one owns a wikia. I never asked or wanted free reign. I have not edit much because 90% of my edits gets reverted, my edit history proves that. I think my edit history, Hontou Kobayashi, and the anon edit history would disapprove that we engage in character attacks and conspiracy theories. If that was true this would be the sixth time accorded to the term “whenever”. I am not sure why it stated we have few edits? We are all new. And me and Kobayashi has been trying to avoid situations like this. It is Kobayashi’s edits that gone unreverted not mine. However, As I had said I have made some edits with my ip address and when I edit something with my ip address they stay untouch. We are three different people, we don’t go and lump you and him together as one. Neither should we be lumped together with falsely accused statements. I have not been making degrading comments. I have not been blaming anyone of trivial matters. I have not been controlling or micromanage. I have not been acting like a superior with a godlike complex. I have not lie about a situation or lie about another user to tarnish them. I am not saying any one is wrong to cover up what happen. The comments I seen to me, and to others are very offensive, insensitive, and malicious. It is actually unpleasant to be here. I reverted the second time because I assume it was not looked at because I did it. It is assumed I am a bad editor or I am a target. However, I don’t lump you in on this because you are a different person, why lump up three different users with different voices to one person and saying one thing which is a lie when what happen says something else. By the way, I asked Kobayashi to take a look at the situation, they are really good at giving honest and truthful views. I understand their messages on the thread and that was the only two messages they were going to make to the subject.

In my house someone claimed that my daughter was not feeding her dogs right. So what does a mother do? I went and got an autofeeder. Now, no one can complain and the dogs feed themselves. Now, here in this situation. Being lied about, treated like a bad user, seems like I am a target. The best you can do, Remove the target. I waited 3 days I am not waiting until Saturday. I am disabling my account to avoid being a target. Kobayashi may not edit here to avoided being an target and one of the reasons why they have not editing besides the reasons they gave. People are leaving and had left, so they will not be a target. There are two choices side with false claims or side with the facts of written words. This is wikia, the prove is there and it sides with that anon and Kobayashi in this situation.

Admins, should be admins to something they know, something they love. They did not attack others, or have personal vendettas toward others to discredit an editor. They did not create hostile environments. They are supposed to be helpful and encouraging others. If there was an admin trying to micromanage me and blame me over something that is out of my hands, assuming me to be a bad editor without looking at the edit or making up things as the reason. I would say “you have no power over me.”

However, you know what they say about assuming… Oh well, I am not longer interested in pursue this trivial matter or helping this wikia. You do what you think is best. See you around. Take care.  