Thread:TsukiYaksha/@comment-28016152-20160520015537/@comment-104.245.37.52-20160523235300

No one has claimed it was vandalism. no one. Yes it obviously not vandalism. Many edits does not make an edit summary on the first revert or a change, even admins don't make summaries all the time. Inuyashaluver22 has made summaries 9 out of 11 times. 2 is not bad for a new editor. No one has claimed that Joe’s edit was vandalism or question his character. Inuyashaluver22 did not start the fight with Joe, the anon and  with you. We could say the same for you, looks like they jumped in because of the persiant attack on Inuyashaluver22. It seems it is from being mad at them reverting the edit you made. They did try to make a discussion. they did try to preserve a page. They assume you did not look at the edit which I would assume is correct. I do want to point out Inuyashaluver22 mention the flea yokai article. Joe made a page and said "Flea Yōkai(妖怪) are smallest bizarre beings that belongs to the demon bugs"  Inuyashaluver22 changes it to "Flea Yōkai(妖怪) are anthropomorphic demons which share certain characteristics with fleas." the summary (Followed the Moth Yokai article, and corrected some of it.)  joe then change it anthropomorphic to tiny cartoonish. Inuyashaluver22 did not tempt to revert it. This is prove they did not want to start a dispute and their compromise ended the dispute on inu yokai page. Tiny cartoonish is not valid it is not in universal. Inuyashaluver22 was looking out for the best interest of the wikia. They get reprimanded, verbal assualt and lied about in what appears to be a vedentta.toward them.

http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Flea_y%C5%8Dkai?diff=prev&oldid=81893