Thread:TsukiYaksha/@comment-28016152-20160520015537/@comment-185.73.39.171-20160521061001

Inuyashluver22 I am sorry to disrespect your wishes. I do understand all the messages.

Lord Hyoga. The edit was an invalid edit. Inu yokai had nothing to do with cerebus. They could had edit out cerebus. They did do edit summaries 2/3 times when no one else did. Also Inuyashaluver22 did say they did start a discussion,but  had interent problems then they provided a picture of their prove then you deleted it acting like it was "a specific page". Then you still scold them over not making a discussion which only backs the claim of the vendetta. This was not Inuyashaluver22's fault. If so, it is not only their fault but all involve in the edits even yours.

And I think they are standing up to you. not over the content, not taking it personally on reverts or policies. They have been mature about it. What they are standing up to is in how you state them. Example: Here they are trying to help and try to work with you and they are still "a small clique of disruptive contributors." Or  trying to tell you they are not by having a discussion which is only a complaint to you. I see very little insults from them but many from your comments toward them or wrote to TsukiYaksha about them. The facts are on their side. You are not talking to them or listening to them just citing policies, or blaming them. Worst making them all one person saying the same. " I've never dealt with anybody this immature or difficult and frankly I don't know how to handle it. They aren't technically violating any policies (yet), they're just being difficult and annoyingly confrontational." How insulting to them when they seem to be good contributors. And you believe they will violate a policy. They have the best interest in mind and they are treated like bad editors with bad intentions. How would you feel if you are trying your hardest for the best of a site and your read "Lord Hyoga is a disruptive contributior" "he acts so immature", "he was wrong," "it is his fault." No wonder why Inuyashaluver22 thinks your biased toward them. I think most of this could had been avoided if your comments did not seem so confrontational toward them. You have them walking on egg shells around you. Maybe actually listening would be better than scolding and claiming they are immature disruptive contributiors.

TsukiYaksha is right to focus on the content. I was surpise to read you did not drop it and continue to scold them and insult them. Especially when it seems they have little interest to drag it on. Two walked away and one has not even said a word on the matter.but has been on. They had no interest so why still scold them and belittle them? Maybe the idea of vendetta toward good contributors is right then? These issues span from how confrontational your comments are toward them. They were not fight the policies or content.