Thread:TsukiYaksha/@comment-28016152-20160512212753/@comment-4576906-20160517050538

...either way, whether you choose to call it neutral or in-universe, a simple change to word choice does not contradict either principle. There is nothing wrong with a "personal preference edit", therefore it was valid and should not have been reverted without an edit summary. As usual, Inuyashalover took a perfectly legitimate question he could have posed, in this case of whether we should use the term "anthropomorphic" when referring to certain types of youkai, and derailed it by ignoring the discussion and consensus-building process by the combative way in which he makes edits.

Feel free to think what you will of such behavior, and make ample excuses for it along the way, but it is impossible to maintain a collaborative editing environment under such conditions. If you condone that sort of behavior (reverts without justification and edit warring) then your idea of how contributors should be treated sounds an awful lot like anarchy. And for the record, your sarcastic and cynical attitude does not score you any points in a mature discussion. If you can't discuss a substantive issue without deviating into nonsense, you shouldn't have joined the discussion in the first place.